Dissipation

From Planets
Revision as of 10:44, 11 May 2022 by LTeinturier (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Description

In the LMD grid point model, nonlinear interactions between explicitly resolved scales and subgrid-scale processes are parameterized by applying a scale-selective horizontal dissipation operator based on an $$n$$ time iterated Laplacian $$\Delta^n$$. For the grid point model, for instance, this can be written:


\begin{align} \label{def:Wns} \frac{\partial q}{\partial t} = \frac{(-1)^n}{\tau_{diss}}(\delta x)^{2n}\Delta^nq \end{align}

where $$\delta x$$ is the smallest horizontal distance represented in the model and $$\tau_{diss}$$ is the dissipation timescale for a structure of scale $$\delta x$$. These operators are necessary to ensure the grid point model numerical stability. In practice, the operator is separately applied to three components :

  • the divergence of the flow,
  • the vorticity of the flow,
  • potential temperature.

We classically use n = 2, n = 1,and n = 2.

How to change it in the model

In practise, the values of $$n$$ and $$\tau_{diss}$$ are prescribed in the run.def with the keys:

  • nitergdiv
  • nitergrot
  • niterh

for the values of $$n$$ on each field, and the associated $$\tau$$:

  • tetagdiv
  • tetagrot
  • tetatemp

In run.def, there is also a key idissip which is the frequency (in dynamical steps) at which to apply the dissipation.

Good to know rules and rules of thumb

  • If your simulation shows numerical instabilities, a good idea is to increase dissipation. This means decreasing parameters $$\tau$$.
  • Optimal values for the dissipation timescales depends on the resolution of the horizontal grid. The higher the resolution, the more dissipation we need.